I was never personally that big into The Lion King (in fact, I didn't see it until it got to a point where I figured my kids probably should), but that wasn't because of my age or having something against that era of Disney films; I liked Mermaid and Aladdin, and loved Beauty and the Beast. The Lion King just didn't draw me in; sometimes it happens.
So, watching it now, as the top money-maker of '94, do I feel like I missed out on the phenomenon? Not really. It's fine. I don't quite get why it's so revered in comparison to the other movies I mentioned, but it's got about everything you'd want from 1994 Disney; the animation is great and a little edgy in terms of technology; the jokes for the grown-ups are there; the songs are fine.
Maybe this is the point: I don't feel that The Lion King is spectacularly better than any of the other movies from that run, but it does touch on all things maybe more completely than the rest. So, an impressively average achievement?
Meanwhile, I remember lots of people thinking that Pulp Fiction was robbed of Best Picture from 1994's slate of movies. Actually, The Shawshank Redemption was, but whaddaya gonna do?
No comments:
Post a Comment